Home > Responses > Response from Shaykh Babikr Ahmed Babikr

Response from Shaykh Babikr Ahmed Babikr

April 29, 2008

Dear brothers and sisters, it appears that we have a response from Shaykh Babikr Ahmed Babikr’s brother in law in regards to him being an advisor to the Quilliam Foundation. It is quite apparent that these phonies have misappropriated his name and names of others for their spurious agenda. Anyways, below is the comment of the brother. We hope that he will return to us with the news that the Shaykh spoke to QF and will remove his name immediately.

ASA
Skeikh Babikar is my brother in law and I spoke to him today about this very matter, Ed hussain approached the sheikh a matter of months ago to ask him to become an advisor to their group. The sheikh having no knowledge of Ed hussain or his group said he would consider it but only after researching their agenda.
The sheikh was extremely shocked when I informed him that his name appears on hussain’s site and he is now taking steps to having it removed.

May Allah strengthen our resolve to expose hussain and his cronies for all they are worth.

Saeed

Categories: Responses
  1. Rauf
    April 21, 2009 at 2:16 pm | #1

    Actually I have spoken to Shaykh Ahmed Ba’bikr (Abu Bakr as-Sudani) personally and he affirmed that he is an advisor to Ed and the Quilliam Foundation but does so in private- he rather that this not be made mention of in public domain to all.

    This is due to hikmah, the fact that if such info. of support becomes public then those that are strongly opposed may wish to insult him also thus publicly it is to be denied.

  2. May 9, 2008 at 9:56 pm | #2

    thats the problem with some scholars. Why not check the backround of those who you are associating yourself with? Even the people around him should of known better.

  3. Will Jones
    May 9, 2008 at 9:49 pm | #3

    They have probably delayed removing the names until after they have sent out their foundation videos to give the impression they still have support to anyone who visits their website

    Typical dishonesty

  4. maqasid
    May 9, 2008 at 11:06 am | #4

    Salam,

    It seems that the brother we were in contact with has disappeared. If you personally know anyone who has contact with the Shaykh please do help. We are hoping and have heard that other advisers are contemplating taking their names off. Make dua.

    wslm

  5. Ali Abdullah
    May 9, 2008 at 8:05 am | #5

    Is there any statement yet?

  6. maqasid
    May 5, 2008 at 1:00 pm | #6

    Salam,

    I am still trying to obtain a statement from the Shaykh. I will post it on the site if I recieve anything IA.

    wslm

  7. Ali Abdullah
    May 5, 2008 at 6:45 am | #7

    Can we just get a statement from the Sheikh? I doubt that the QF site will change in a hurry!

  8. Will Jones
    May 4, 2008 at 4:01 pm | #8

    Was wondering – when will this actually take place?

    (Sadly – the Sheikhs name is still up there)

  9. April 29, 2008 at 9:05 pm | #9

    this article is fantastic on your website

  10. Will Jones
    April 29, 2008 at 4:47 pm | #10

    JUST wanted to point you to this:

    http://worldhaveyoursay.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/are-there-some-people-we-shouldnt-invite-onto-whys/#comment-19249

    JUST shows the hypocrisy even more – isn’t their “open challenge” to HT on their website, and yet they can’t show up on a radio show for fear of being exposed

  11. April 29, 2008 at 8:59 am | #11

    Alhamdulillah!

    look forward to the article of the Shaykh from Jeruslem.

  12. traditionalislamism
    April 29, 2008 at 1:48 am | #12

    Jazak Allah khairan for your efforts brother. Another advisor “bites the dust” :)

  13. traditionalislamism
    April 29, 2008 at 1:46 am | #13

    Jazak Allah khairan for your efforts brother. Another advisor “bites the dust” :)

Comments are closed.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.